[lpi-discuss] Linux Training Attains A New Standard

Matthew Geddes mgeddes at tellurian.com.au
Thu Oct 14 02:24:33 EDT 2004

On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 15:49, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Ted Cook wrote:
> | Nice piece. Speaking of standards,though, we need to all
> | standardize on "Approved" as opposed to "Authorized" (or
> | authorised, as the case may be) for both LATP and LATM.
> Agreed. The term "authorized" should not be in our lexicon, since it
> can be seen to imply official status. "Approved" simply means that we
> have recognized the achievement or commitment of certain partners and
> training materials.

Is there anything on the LPI site about the LATP and LATM stuff? I had a
look, but often have trouble finding what I'm looking for. ;-)


More information about the lpi-discuss mailing list