[lpi-discuss] Re: MAC/RBAC: Should be a LPIC-3-only consideration
(especially if POSIX ACLs are)
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Thu Aug 18 13:47:54 EDT 2005
Matt Benjamin <matt at linuxbox.com> wrote:
> We are not disagreeing here: I'm speaking about systems
> like Grsecurity or RSBAC, which are kernel-enforced. (I
> can't think of anything not kernel-enforced that I would
> mean by MAC, but...)
Okay, fair enough.
BTW, I wasn't the one that brought up SELinux.
Someone else used it as an analogy.
In fact, coming back to that analogy, given the existance of
other solutions than SELinux, it's not a good one. I guess
I'm I'm a little biased to SELinux going forward, and I
failed to recognize that.
There is no "alternative" for IPv6.
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
More information about the lpi-discuss