[lpi-discuss] Principles for creation of exam objectives

[Evan Leibovitch]

Torsten Scheck wrote:

>But the issues resulting from this discussion (Let's make a survey about
>MTA usage! What relevance would the survey's results have for our
>decision? ...) showed, that we either lack detailed processes or that
>the list members don't know about their existence.
>  
>
The key word here is "detailed".

The Wiki says: "Update L1 Objectives, using community feedback collected 
during this period", but doesn't specify how to do that (beyond 
suggesting that public input is collected by one-way non-interactive 
communication using RT). The questions regarding "do we do a survey" etc 
are, in their own way, trying to define the details as the process moves 
along because it wasn't sufficiently defined in advance.

>I want to support the current process, not question it
>  
>
The messy necessity of turning theory into practice does not in itself 
question the theory.

- Evan