[lpi-discuss] Principles for creation of exam objectives
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Fri Jul 29 12:49:26 EDT 2005
Mark Miller <mark.miller at lpi.org> wrote:
> For example there seems to be no logical way to find common
> ground on starting and stopping services between a Redhat
> based system and a Debian based system. Both CAN
> support the Debian method but typically Redhat
> administrators will use a different method. It would be
> unfair to expect them to know the lower level method
> because they never use it! In cases like this (there are
> more than you know) we try to accommodate both methods.
In reality, FC1+/RHEL3+ are LSB-compliant on init (although
they don't do dependency resolution like SuSE, Debian, etc...
yet) in that they are in /etc/init.d and /etc/rc#.d (even if
only symlinks). LPI tests to LSB by default IIRC, so a Linux
administrator should know this (other than just the "service"
BTW, just wait until FC5+/RHEL5+ ;-> There is a new
DBUS-based init service in development, largely as an answer
to Sun's similar init changes in Solaris 10. I believe SuSE
is also moving in this direction.
I.e., the old /etc/init.d is becoming legacy.
> Not so rare, but thankfully most are not as deeply divided
> as the MTA issue seems to get.
Well, that's what I meant.
> Actually this is blurring together. It is no longer as
> likely that an admin will only know one or the other. In
> addition things like apt-get for RPM is making the concept
> easier to grasp for non-Debian folks.
Yes and no. Before FC3, I was a huge APT-RPM proponent.
With the new changes in RPM meta-data, the APT-RPM has yet to
add them. I'm sure part of this is because Debian and Red
Hat handle x86-64 differently. Debian/DPKG uses a chroot (a
good way to do it IMHO) and Red Hat/RPM now allows multiple
packages for the same version (which has advantages, and
I think SmartPM is going to revolutionize it all though.
I've yet to see one negative of it, other than the fact that
> BTW, you missed the whole emerge thing! ;)
I try to avoid bringing "ports" distros into the discussion.
[ BTW, I'm a Gentoo user too, and worked on a book together
with Daniel Robbins. ;-]
I stuck solely to "packages" distros, namely the two major
GPL ones, Debian and Fedora, or anything based on this, as
well as SuSE (which is pretty much GPL now too).
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
More information about the lpi-discuss