[lpi-discuss] General comments on LPI levels (Openldap)
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Mon Sep 19 14:03:02 EDT 2005
Matt Benjamin <matt at linuxbox.com> wrote:
> The CIFS-VFS folks, while I personally think it's dubious,
> seem quite serious at least to judge from mailing list
> posts, about first-class Unix client access to Samba file
> service.
I wish them the best.
In my continued experience, the VFS hack is far from usable.
It breaks on codepage and case issues regularly.
But a core problem is that UNIX client to Samba server is one
thing, but a UNIX client to native Windows SMB server is
another. Microsoft Services for UNIX (SFU), now a standard
part of NT 6.0 Server, NFS service works a crapload better.
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
More information about the lpi-discuss
mailing list