LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional
Institute changes...
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Mon Dec 4 23:44:49 EST 2006
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 23:29 -0500, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> ** -- The only major difference was that originally exam 102 was
> envisioned as a number of distribution-specific options. That later was
> pruned down to a binary RPM/DPKG choice, and eventually they merged too.
> There are some minor differences on LPIC-3 but it's still pretty close.
To your credit, SuSE _did_ release a 103 exam for the short-lived, and
clearly "rushed to market" after Novell's acquisition (probably to
appease those independent trainers who licensed its materials and ran
the courses), SCLP. Novell replaced the SLCP with the NCLP practicum
exam and its own course materials. Anyone who pass the SCLP during its
brief 3-4 months of availability was subsequently awarded the NCLP.
Had the program been given time to mature, it would have been an ideal
example. Then again, wasn't Ubuntu doing the same for its track? Or
was that someone else?
--
Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------
Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution
More information about the lpi-discuss
mailing list