[lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy

[Bryan J. Smith]

Alan McKinnon <alan at linuxholdings.co.za> wrote:
> OK, the truth is that it's just more than individual professional 
> members. From http://www.lpi.org/en/lpi/english/about_lpi
> ...
> So it's both. But note that that means individuals and industry,
> not just industry.

Which is why you must be _careful_ when you start stating what LPI is
and what it was founded upon.  It's the difference between being a
"considerate, impartial peer professional" and just another
"grandstanding peer."  ;->

Thank you for [re-]educating yourself after I pointed it out.

> And it would seem that only industry was consulted with this latest
> move, and the extent of how much consultation was done with whom
> has yet to be established.

And then the rhetoric starts ... sigh.
My apologies to the list for even responding to Alan.
I'll shut-up now.



-- 
Bryan J. Smith   Professional, Technical Annoyance
b.j.smith at ieee.org    http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
     Fission Power:  An Inconvenient Solution